Project Reflection

Throughout this course, I have developed a much stronger understanding of my writing process, as well as how rhetoric, genre, and audience shape effective communication. At the beginning of the semester, I approached writing mainly as a way to present information. However, through completing Project 1 and Project 2, I learned that writing is not just about what you say, but how you say it, who you are saying it to, and why it matters in a specific context. This course helped me become more intentional in my writing and more aware of the choices I make as a writer.

​

In Project 1, my investigative essay on stem cell therapies allowed me to build my research and analytical skills. I worked with multiple scholarly sources and learned how to evaluate their credibility, synthesize their ideas, and connect them into one cohesive argument. Before this project, I tended to summarize sources individually rather than fully integrating them into my writing. Through revision and feedback, I learned how to place sources in conversation with each other, which made my argument stronger and more developed. I also improved my ability to organize my ideas logically and create smoother transitions between sections. Revising this essay for my portfolio helped me focus on global revision, meaning I improved my thesis, clarified my argument, and strengthened the overall structure rather than just fixing small grammar mistakes.

​

Project 2, the multigenre persuasive campaign, helped me understand how writing changes depending on audience and purpose. Instead of writing one traditional essay, I had to create a brochure, a social media infographic campaign, and an opinion editorial. Each of these required a different tone, style, and level of detail. For example, the brochure needed to be simple, clear, and easy to understand for patients and families who may not have a scientific background. The infographic posts needed to be short, engaging, and visually focused to fit a social media audience. The opinion editorial, on the other hand, required a more formal and persuasive tone to appeal to policymakers and healthcare professionals. This project showed me that effective communication depends on adapting to the audience, not just presenting the same information in the same way.

​

Through both projects, I gained a better understanding of rhetorical strategies, especially ethos, pathos, and logos. In my writing, I worked to build ethos by using credible sources and presenting accurate information. I used logos by organizing my ideas logically and supporting my argument with evidence. I also considered pathos by focusing on patient safety and the real-life impact of misinformation, especially in my multigenre campaign. Learning how to use these rhetorical appeals helped me think more carefully about how my writing influences readers and how I can make my arguments more effective.

​

Another important concept I learned in this course is the idea of discourse communities. Before this class, I did not fully understand how different fields, such as science and medicine, have their own expectations for communication. Through my research on stem cell therapies, I saw how important accuracy, credibility, and evidence are in scientific writing. At the same time, I also learned that when communicating with a general audience, the language and structure need to change to make the information more accessible. Understanding discourse communities helped me see that writing is not one-size-fits-all, and that effective communication depends on understanding the expectations of a specific group.

​

My writing process has also improved significantly throughout this course. In the past, I tended to focus mostly on drafting and making small edits. However, I now understand the importance of revision, especially global revision. Instead of only correcting grammar, I learned to look at the bigger picture, including my thesis, organization, and use of evidence. Revising my work helped me see where my ideas needed to be clearer or more developed. I also became more comfortable making larger changes to improve my writing, rather than trying to keep my original draft mostly the same.

​

Additionally, I learned how important it is to plan my writing and think about purpose and audience before I begin. In Project 2, I had to consider not only what I wanted to say, but how to present it in different formats. This helped me become more flexible as a writer and more aware of how different genres function. I also learned that writing is a process that involves multiple stages, including brainstorming, drafting, revising, and editing.

​

Overall, this course has helped me grow as a writer by improving my ability to analyze, adapt, and communicate ideas effectively. I now feel more confident in my ability to approach different types of writing tasks and adjust my style based on the situation. The skills I developed in this class, such as working with sources, understanding rhetoric, and revising my work, will be useful in my future academic and professional goals. As a biology major interested in healthcare or medical research, I know that clear and effective communication is essential. This course has given me a strong foundation that I can continue to build on in future writing contexts.